Myth of the cave
| Sunday 23rd March 2008 16:29CDT | → 0 Comments |
If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.
And so it goes with philosophy - which is both good and bad. The good part is obvious, the bad part is when you’re itching to study a particular work. In my case it’s Heidegger, specifically Being and Time - which I’ve heard is the most amazingly original philosophical work of the 20th Century. However, opinion has it that due to it being such a dense and complex book that builds on the ideas of Heidegger’s predecessors you have to study Nietzsche (e.g. Beyond Good and Evil) and Husserl (e.g. Logical Investigations) first…
… and before you can read them you have to have read Kirkegaard (e.g. Either/Or)…
… and before you can read Kirkegaard you have to have read Kant (e.g. Critique of Pure Reason)…
… and before you can read Kant you have to have read Descartes (e.g. Meditations on First Philosophy).
I think you can get away with starting at Descartes, if you have already have a good understanding of classical and mediaeval philosophy. Alternatively, just read Sophie’s World instead.
Maybe after all that, I can then move forwards to Existentialism and eventually Semiotics (as I see Organizational Semiotics as the next big thing in project management).
BTW trivia note: Sophie’s World is set in Norway and I was co-incidentally in Norway the first time I read it (Mjølfjell, to be precise).
It snowed a bit today. Only a bit.






